The hand holds a dove, still alive. Is it subjugation? Is it the intention to defeat the other?
The image is based on a print by the Taller de Gráfica Popular, from a period in which I recognize a Mexico still possessing a living national project. The popular struggle remained in tension, and power itself was still in transit.
It seems to me a key period for our country’s graphic expression, because—being so representative of the left—it ultimately became suppressed and crushed so that it would be forgotten.
I return to it not because it belongs to the left or right, but rather because of what it represents: it is coarse strength—carved, engraved, hard. In contrast stands ‘the other,’ the subjugated one who appears fragile, vulnerable to death, hoping not to become free but to take the place of the hard hand. ‘Then it is my turn, right?’
In seeking this anchor from which to create something, the reference for the Spanish word poder—power—in the Royal Spanish Academy dictionary reads: ‘To possess the free faculty or power to do something. Capable of defeating it.’ Capable, in turn, is defined as:
• Possessing scope or space
• Sufficient to receive or contain another thing within itself
• Large or spacious
• Able to accomplish something; daring to do it
• Qualified to exercise a right and fulfill an obligation ‘personally’
It seems to me that in Mexico, rather than power being exercised, capacity is exercised. Although they may appear the same, for me the difference they contain is enormous: power as a philosophical dilemma, as a great whole, versus being capable, which is only one part—or a set of parts that together are contained within oneself.
In creating the image of that hand holding the dove—an image as commonplace and overused as it may be, yet timeless all the same—the hand holds the dove motionless, still alive.
The hand says: ‘I am capable of screwing you over again, keeping you subjugated, keeping you in a position, pretending to listen to you, to see you defeated.’
‘You have authorized me to exercise all my capacities while I pretend you matter to me.’
‘Power is in my hand, and I am capable of tightening my fist while always taking care not to kill you. If I do—if I finish you—then with whom else would I be capable?’
A CONFUSING ROAD WITHOUT DIALOGUE
Today I see Mexico filled with this bureaucratic capacity to define itself through complex abilities that succeed in distancing anyone from an encounter. Not those technocrats. The road is confusing, difficult, filled with twists and turns that only an expert in those wastelands can navigate. There is no possibility of dialogue. The technocrats have created a parallel world for themselves, one in which their morality has nothing to do with that of ordinary citizens. Not only that: they have transferred responsibility to everyone else so that the difference becomes even more complex, even more difficult. My grandfather, who was a Senator of the Republic, used to say: ‘There are two kinds of Mexicans: those who make the laws and those who follow them. I am one of those who make them.’ Without reservation I can say that, although I disagree with him, the statement did buttress the political class. It is a principle that, in the absence of judgment, project, and leadership, managed to establish itself and become expressed through these capacities.
The evidence lies in the Constitution itself, which now resembles a procedures manual that justifies and protects the capacities of those who work in public service. Purpose has been lost, buried beneath ‘capacities’ understood perfectly well for their own benefit.
I might disagree with Machiavelli’s statement that ‘…a prince who wishes to preserve power is often forced not to be good…’
For it is not the desire to preserve power; it is power itself that corrupts. Lord Acton defined it that way, and went further: absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Curiously, power has larger expressions: conquest, dominion, the ability to establish wider borders, capacities for subjugating the other.
In Mexico, power is redefined through these half-formed capacities. It does not conquer; it allows an exercise that manages itself, grows like a fractal rather than as the force of a single impact, a single definition.
Perhaps what we truly lack is the willingness to recognize ourselves in that force which, like dampness, grows everywhere, invades, and allows fungi to spread—there, under other rules we seem unable to see because we are somewhere else.